A scoping review and best evidence synthesis for treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff disorders include a broad spectrum of pathological conditions including partial-thickness and full-thickness tears. Studies have shown partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT) prevalence to be twice that of full-thickness tears. In the working population, PTRCTs are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain and often result in occupational disability due to pain, stiffness, and loss of shoulder function. Treatment of PTRCTs remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to consolidate the existing high-quality evidence on best management approaches in treating PTRCTs using both nonoperative and operative approaches. METHODS: A scoping review with best evidence synthesis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Library (Wiley), SCOPUS, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), PubMed Central, and Science Direct were searched from 2000 to March 3, 2023. Level 1 studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses that included level 1 and 2 studies, were included. RESULTS: The search yielded 8276 articles. A total of 3930 articles were screened after removing 4346 duplicates. Application of inclusion criteria resulted in 662 articles that were selected for full-text review. Twenty-eight level 1 studies, 1 systematic review, 4 meta-analyses, and 1 network meta-analyses were included in the best evidence synthesis. Nonoperative strategies included injections (ie, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroid, prolotherapy, sodium hyaluronate, anesthetic, and atelocollagen), exercise therapy, and physical agents. Operative interventions consisted of débridement, shaving of the tendon and footprint, transtendon repair, and traditional suture anchor repair techniques with and without tear completion. Both nonoperative and operative strategies demonstrated effectiveness at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. The evidence supports the effectiveness of surgical intervention in treating PTRCTs regardless of arthroscopic technique. CONCLUSION: The results of this scoping review do not support superiority of operative over nonoperative management and suggest that both strategies can be effective at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. Surgery, however, is the most invasive and costly approach, with the highest risk of complications such as infection. Other variables such as patient expectation, treating practitioner bias, or preference may change which modalities are offered and in what sequence.

Consensus for a primary care clinical decision-making tool for assessing, diagnosing, and managing shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent condition and a significant cause of morbidity and functional disability. Current data suggests that many patients presenting with shoulder pain at the primary care level are not receiving high quality care. Primary care decision-making is complex and has the potential to influence the quality of care provided and patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision-making tool that standardizes care and minimizes uncertainty in assessment, diagnosis, and management. METHODS: First a rapid review was conducted to identify existing tools and evidence that could support a comprehensive clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain. Secondly, provincial consensus was established for the assessment, diagnosis, and management of patients presenting to primary care with shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada using a three-step modified Delphi approach. This project was a highly collaborative effort between Alberta Health Services' Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network (BJH SCN) and the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI). RESULTS: A clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain was developed and reached consensus by a province-wide expert panel representing various health disciplines and geographical regions. This tool consists of a clinical examination algorithm for assessing, diagnosis, and managing shoulder pain; recommendations for history-taking and identification of red flags or additional concerns; recommendations for physical examination and neurological screening; recommendations for the differential diagnosis; and care pathways for managing patients presenting with rotator cuff disease, biceps pathology, superior labral tear, adhesive capsulitis, osteoarthritis, and instability. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical decision-making tool will help to standardize care, provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain, and assist in clinical decision-making for primary care providers in both public and private sectors.

Is Immobilization Necessary for Early Return to Work Following Distal Biceps Repair Using a Cortical Button Technique?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in surgical fixation to repair distal biceps tendon ruptures have not fully translated to earlier postoperative mobilization; it is unknown whether earlier mobilization affords earlier functional return to work. This parallel-arm randomized controlled trial compared the impact of early mobilization versus 6 weeks of postoperative immobilization following distal biceps tendon repair. METHODS: One hundred and one male participants with a distal biceps tendon rupture that was amenable to a primary repair with use of a cortical button were randomized to early mobilization (self-weaning from sling and performance of active range of motion as tolerated during first 6 weeks) (n = 49) or 6 weeks of immobilization (splinting for 6 weeks with no active range of motion) (n = 52). Follow-up assessments were performed by a blinded assessor at 2 and 6 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months. At 12 months, distal biceps tendon integrity was verified with ultrasound. The primary outcome was return to work. Secondary outcomes were pain, range of motion, strength, shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score, and tendon integrity. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. A linear mixed model for repeated measures was used to compare pain, range of motion, strength, and QuickDASH between the groups over time; return to work was assessed with use of independent t tests. RESULTS: The groups were similar preoperatively (p ≥ 0.16). The average age (and standard deviation) was 44.7 ± 8.6 years. Eighty-three participants (82%) were followed to 12 months. There were no differences between the groups in terms of return to work (p ≥ 0.83). Participants in the early mobilization group had significantly more passive forearm supination (p = 0.04), with passive forearm pronation (p = 0.06) and active extension and supination (p = 0.09) trending toward significantly greater range of motion in the early mobilization group relative to the immobilization group. Participants in the early mobilization group had significantly better QuickDASH scores over time than those in the immobilization group (p = 0.02). There were no differences between the groups in terms of pain (p ≥ 0.45), active range of motion (p ≥ 0.09), or strength (p ≥ 0.70). Two participants (2.0%, 1 in each group) had full-thickness tears on ultrasound at 12 months (p = 0.61). Compliance was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Early motion after distal biceps tendon repair with cortical button fixation is well tolerated and does not appear to be associated with adverse outcomes. No clinically important group differences were seen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Move It or Lose It? The Effect of Early Active Movement on Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of early active shoulder movement after rotator cuff repair, compared to delayed active shoulder movement, on clinical outcomes, rotator cuff integrity, and return to work. STUDY DESIGN: Intervention systematic review. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched 14 databases in November 2017 and updated the search in December 2018 and February 2020. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included comparative studies that assessed the effect of early active shoulder movement versus delayed active shoulder movement following rotator cuff repair. DATA SYNTHESIS: Means and SDs were used to calculate weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for outcomes of interest. The sensitivity analysis included only randomized controlled trials and was performed when heterogeneity among studies was statistically significant. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total of 756 participants (early active shoulder movement, n = 379; delayed active shoulder movement, n = 377) were included. There was high-certainty evidence favoring early active movement for forward flexion (6 weeks), abduction (6 weeks), and external rotation (6 weeks and 3 and 6 months) postsurgery. There was moderate-certainty evidence of worse Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index score (6 weeks) for the early active movement group, and no difference in rotator cuff integrity between the early and delayed active movement groups. There were no group differences for all other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients who commenced active shoulder movement early after rotator cuff repair had greater shoulder range of motion and worse shoulder-specific quality of life after surgery than patients who delayed active shoulder movement. However, the group differences did not appear to be clinically important, and rotator cuff integrity was similar. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(7):331-344. Epub 15 May 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.9634.

Factors associated with maintaining reduction following locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Loss of reduction (LoR) can occur after locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). This study determined biomechanical features of fracture fixation associated with preventing LoR postoperatively. One-year reoperation rates were also compared between those with/without LoR. METHODS: Population-based administrative data for 359 adults treated using a locking plate for PHF between 2010 and 2016 were examined. Two trained assessors reviewed standardized shoulder radiographs. LoR (Yes/No) was defined as any fracture displacement >0.5 cm, and/or >10° change in neck-shaft angle (NSA) alignment relative to intraoperative imaging. Multiple logistic regression assessed how the following affected maintaining reduction: (1) sex, (2) age, (3) Neer classification, (4) shaft impaction (SI), (5) shaft medialization (SM), (6) calcar reduction (CR), (7) NSA alignment, and (8) screw use. RESULTS: LoR was seen in 79 (22%) patients. LoR was significantly associated with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06/yr, P < .001), fracture severity (4-part vs. 2-part fracture; OR = 4.63, P = .001), and varus NSA alignment (<125° vs. ≥145°: OR = 5.6, P = .02; <125° vs. 125-145°, OR = 2.2, P = .02]). Patients achieving simultaneous SI, SM, and CR were significantly less likely (OR = 0.009, P < .001) to lose reduction, after controlling for age, fracture severity, and NSA alignment. If only SI was achieved, patients were still significantly less likely to lose reduction relative to achieving none of these mechanical features (OR = 0.17, P = .006). Reoperations were higher when LoR occurred (n = 26/77 [33.4%]) compared with no LoR (n = 20/276 [7.2%]) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SI was strongly associated with preventing LoR in patients treated using a locking plate for PHF. SI with concurrent SM, CR, and a neutral or valgus NSA had the lowest rates of LoR. LoR was associated with higher rates of reoperation.

Can clinical assessment differentiate partial thickness rotator cuff tears from full thickness rotator cuff tears? A secondary analysis.

Purpose: Shoulder pain causes significant disability, with rotator cuff disease as a common diagnosis. Differentially diagnosing partial tears of the rotator cuff tendons is difficult despite use of imaging and clinical examination. Our objective was to determine if a clinical assessment framework could discriminate between patients with partial and full thickness tears.Materials and Methods: Pre-operative baseline data from two randomized controlled trials of 452 adult patients awaiting rotator cuff repair were analyzed in this secondary analysis. Nineteen items from a pre-defined clinical assessment framework were investigated for association with the outcome of surgically confirmed partial or full thickness tear. Logistic regression tested independent associations and multivariable models were developed to create the most parsimonious model.Results: Thirty-two participants (7%) had partial thickness tears. Constant Power Score was the sole item associated with partial thickness tears (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12). Traumatic mechanism of injury trended toward significance (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.06-4.48).Conclusions: Greater abduction strength (i.e., Constant Power Score) was associated with partial thickness tears. Other clinical assessment items did not differentiate between partial and full tears. Our results add to the growing body of research showing most clinical findings are not associated with a diagnosis in rotator cuff disease.Implications for RehabilitationGreater shoulder abduction strength (as measured with the Constant Power Score) was associated with partial thickness rotator cuff tears.Most findings within our clinical assessment framework did not distinguish between partial thickness and full thickness rotator cuff tears and thus, did not contribute to a differential pathoanatomical diagnosis.Since structural integrity of the rotator cuff and patient presentation show poor association, and rehabilitation intervention is often impairment-based, pathoanatomical diagnosis may not adequately direct non-surgical treatment. Including movement-based diagnoses or treatment classification systems in evaluation of rotator cuff disease may improve selection of appropriate conservative treatment.

Exploring the Business Case for Improving Quality of Care for Patients With Chronic Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, management of patients presenting with chronic rotator cuff tears in Alberta is in need of quality improvements. This article explores the potential impact of a proposed care pathway whereby all patients presenting with chronic rotator cuff tears in Alberta would adopt an early, conservative management plan as the first stage of care; ultrasound investigation would be the preferred tool for diagnosing a rotator cuff tear; and only patients are referred for surgery once conservative measures have been exhausted. METHODS: We evaluate evidence in support of surgery and conservative management, compare care in the current state with the proposed care pathway, and identify potential solutions in moving toward optimal care. RESULTS: A literature search resulted in an absence of indications for either surgical or conservative management. Conservative management has the potential to reduce utilization of public health care resources and may be preferable to surgery. The proposed care pathway has the potential to avoid nearly Can $87 000 in public health care costs in the current system for every 100 patients treated successfully with conservative management. CONCLUSION: The proposed care pathway is a low-cost, first-stage treatment that is cost-effective and has the potential to reduce unnecessary, costly surgical procedures.

Early Active Motion Versus Sling Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of early mobilization (EM) with standard rehabilitation (SR) over the initial 24 months following arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair. METHODS: A total of 206 patients with full-thickness RC tears undergoing arthroscopic repair were randomized following preoperative assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, strength, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to either EM (n = 103; self-weaned from sling and performed pain-free active ROM during the first 6 weeks) or SR (n = 103; wore a sling for 6 weeks with no active ROM). Shoulder ROM, pain, and HRQOL were reassessed at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively by a blinded assessor. At 6, 12, and 24 months, strength was reassessed. At 12 months, ultrasound verified RC integrity. Independent t tests assessed 6-week group differences and 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance assessed changes over time between groups. RESULTS: The groups were similar preoperatively (P > .12). The mean age of participants was 55.9 (minimum, 26; maximum, 79) years, and 131 (64%) were men. A total of 171 (83%) patients were followed to 24 months. At 6 weeks postoperatively, EM participants had significantly better forward flexion and abduction (P < .03) than the SR participants; no other group differences were noted. Over 24 months, there were no group differences in ROM after 6 weeks (P > .08), and pain (P > .06), strength (P = .35), or HRQOL (P > .20) at any time. Fifty-two (25%) subjects (30% EM; 33% SR) had a full-thickness tear present at 12-month postoperative ultrasound testing (P > .8). CONCLUSIONS: EM did not show significant clinical benefits, but there was no compromise of postoperative ROM, pain, strength, or HRQOL. Repair integrity was similar at 12 months postoperatively between groups. Consideration should be given to allow pain-free active ROM within the first 6 weeks following arthroscopic RC repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, high-quality randomized controlled trial.

Validation of a tool to assess patient satisfaction, waiting times, healthcare utilization, and cost.

AIM: Patients' experience of the quality of care received throughout their continuum of care can be used to direct quality improvement efforts in areas where they are most needed. This study aims to establish validity and reliability of the Healthcare Access and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (HAPSQ) - a tool that collects patients' experience that quantifies aspect of care used to make judgments about quality from the perspective of the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health (AQMH). BACKGROUND: The AQMH is a framework that can be used to assess and compare the quality of care in different healthcare settings. The AQMH provides a common language, understanding, and approach to assessing quality. The HAPSQ is one tool that is able to assess quality of care according to five of six AQMH's dimensions. METHODS: This was a prospective methodologic study. Between March and October 2015, a convenience sample of patients presenting with chronic full-thickness rotator cuff tears was recruited prospectively from the University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Reliability of the HAPSQ was assessed using test-retest reliability [interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.70]. Validity was assessed through content validity (patient interviews, floor and ceiling effects), criterion validity (percent agreement >70%), and construct validity (hypothesis testing). FINDINGS: Reliability testing was completed on 70 patients; validity testing occurred on 96 patients. The mean duration of symptoms was three years (SD: 5.0, range: 0.1-29). Only out-of-pocket utilization possessed an ICC<0.70. Patients reported that items were relevant and appropriate to measuring quality of care. No floor or ceiling effects were present. Criterion validity was reached for all items assessed. A priori hypotheses were confirmed. The HAPSQ represents an inexpensive, reliable, and valid approach toward collecting clinical information across a patient's continuum of care.

Evaluating quality of care for patients with rotator cuff disorders.

BACKGROUND: Measuring quality in healthcare is vital in evaluating patient outcomes and system performance. The availability of reliable and valid information about the quality of care for patients presenting with rotator cuff disorders (RCD) in Alberta, Canada is scarce. The objective of this study is to measure quality of care for patients with RCD in order to identify areas of improvement. METHODS: This study employs descriptive survey research design. Between March 2015 and November 2016, a convenience sample of patients presenting with chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears to two sport medicine centres in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta completed two questionnaires: the Healthcare Access and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (HAPSQ) and the Rotator Cuff Quality-of-Life Index (RC-QOL). Data collected using both questionnaires were used to make judgments about quality of care. Quality of care was evaluated using six dimensions of quality defined by the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health: accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, appropriateness, and safety. Data was also used to compare current patient clinical pathways to ideal clinical pathway algorithms and used to make judgments about the appropriateness and safety of healthcare practices. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients participated in the study. The longest mean waiting times for medical services in Alberta were for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) received in the public sector (103 days) and consultation by orthopaedic surgeon (172 days). Patient satisfaction with respect to quality of care was lowest for emergency room physician and highest for orthopaedic surgeon visits. Patients were treated by a mean of 2.5 physicians (SD: 0.77, range: 2-7). The total aggregate average cost per patient was $4541.19. The mean RC-QOL score for all patients was 42 (SD: 22). Only 54 patients (64%) requiring surgery were able to consult with a surgeon within benchmark timeframes. A comparison of current to ideal clinical pathway algorithms found that 38 patients (22%) experienced indirect clinical pathways, whereby care was fragmented and patients received care from multiple and often, redundant healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between current and ideal clinical pathways whereby some patients are experiencing quality of care that is inefficient, disjointed, and less than ideal.

Indication for Computed Tomography Scan in Shoulder Instability: Sensitivity and Specificity of Standard Radiographs to Predict Bone Defects After Traumatic Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying glenohumeral bone loss is key in preoperative surgical planning for a successful Bankart repair. HYPOTHESIS: Simple radiographs can accurately measure bone defects in cases of recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A true anteroposterior (AP) view, alone and in combination with an axillary view, was used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of radiographs compared with computed tomography (CT) scan, the current gold standard, to predict significant bone defects in 70 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Detection of glenoid bone loss on plain film radiographs, with and without axillary view, had a sensitivity of 86% for both views and a specificity of 73% and 64% with and without the axillary view, respectively. For detection of humeral bone loss, the sensitivity was 8% and 17% and the specificity was 98% and 91% with and without the axillary view, respectively. Regular radiographs would have missed 1 instance of significant bone loss on the glenoid side and 20 on the humeral side. Interobserver reliabilities were moderate for glenoid detection (κ = 0.473-0.503) and poor for the humeral side (κ = 0.278-0.336). CONCLUSION: Regular radiographs showed suboptimal sensitivity, specificity, and reliability. Therefore, CT scan should be considered in the treatment algorithm for accurate quantification of bone loss to prevent high rates of recurrent instability.

Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting to the healthcare system with rotator cuff pathology do not always receive high quality care. High quality care occurs when a patient receives care that is accessible, appropriate, acceptable, effective, efficient, and safe. The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to develop a clinical pathway algorithm that sets forth a stepwise process for making decisions about the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff pathology presenting to primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare settings; and 2) to establish clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff pathology to inform decision-making processes within the algorithm. METHODS: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Fourteen experts representing athletic therapy, physiotherapy, sport medicine, and orthopaedic surgery were invited to participate as the expert panel. In round 1, 123 best practice statements were distributed to the panel. Panel members were asked to mark "agree" or "disagree" beside each statement, and provide comments. The same voting method was again used for round 2. Round 3 consisted of a final face-to-face meeting. RESULTS: In round 1, statements were grouped and reduced to 44 statements that met consensus. In round 2, five statements reached consensus. In round 3, ten statements reached consensus. Consensus was reached for 59 statements representing five domains: screening, diagnosis, physical examination, investigations, and treatment. The final face-to-face meeting was also used to develop clinical pathway algorithms (i.e., clinical care pathways) for three types of rotator cuff pathology: acute, chronic, and acute-on-chronic. CONCLUSION: This consensus guideline will help to standardize care, provide guidance on the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff pathology, and assist in clinical decision-making for all healthcare professionals.

Imaging methods for quantifying glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone loss in traumatic instability of the shoulder: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral instability is a common problem following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Two major risk factors of recurrent instability are glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone loss. Higher failure rates of arthroscopic Bankart repairs are associated with larger degrees of bone loss; therefore it is important to accurately and reliably quantify glenohumeral bone loss pre-operatively. This may be done with radiography, CT, or MRI; however no gold standard modality or method has been determined. A scoping review of the literature was performed to identify imaging methods for quantifying glenohumeral bone loss. METHODS: The scoping review was systematic in approach using a comprehensive search strategy and standardized study selection and evaluation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Initial selection included articles from January 2000 until July 2013, and was based on the review of titles and abstracts. Articles were carried forward if either reviewer thought that the study was appropriate. Final study selection was based on full text review based on pre-specified criteria. Consensus was reached for final article inclusion through discussion amongst the investigators. One reviewer extracted data while a second reviewer independently assessed data extraction for discrepancies. RESULTS: Forty-one studies evaluating glenoid and/or Hill-Sachs bone loss were included: 32 studies evaluated glenoid bone loss while 11 studies evaluated humeral head bone loss. Radiography was useful as a screening tool but not to quantify glenoid bone loss. CT was most accurate but necessitates radiation exposure. The Pico Method and Glenoid Index method were the most accurate and reliable methods for quantifying glenoid bone loss, particularly when using three-dimensional CT (3DCT). Radiography and CT have been used to quantify Hill-Sachs bone loss, but have not been studied as extensively as glenoid bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Radiography can be used for screening patients for significant glenoid bone loss. CT imaging, using the Glenoid Index or Pico Method, has good evidence for accurate quantification of glenoid bone loss. There is limited evidence to guide imaging of Hill-Sachs bone loss. As a consensus has not been reached, further study will help to clarify the best imaging modality and method for quantifying glenohumeral bone loss.

Suprascapular nerve injury during arthroscopic superior labral repair: a prospective evaluation.

PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluated suprascapular nerve injury risk during arthroscopic superior labral repair in patients of average height or shorter. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 12 patients <179 cm tall undergoing arthroscopic superior labral repair were prospectively enrolled. Portal location, tear and anchor characteristics, and surgeon impression of medial glenoid wall perforation were collected. Suprascapular nerve conduction studies were obtained postoperatively. A musculoskeletal radiologist evaluated medial glenoid wall perforation and the distance from the anchor to the suprascapular neurovascular bundle on postoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI). DASH scores were recorded preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Medial wall perforation occurred in five (42 %) patients, with 3 patients having a single perforation and two patients having two perforations. Eight of 38 (21 %) anchors drilled into the superior half of the glenoid, and 6 of 20 (30 %) anchors inserted into the postero-superior quadrant of the glenoid, perforated the medial wall. Perforations occurred both through the portal of Wilmington and the antero-superior portal. The distance to the suprascapular neurovascular bundle from the perforating anchors ranged from 0 to 4 mm. Nerve conduction studies revealed subclinical signs of an incomplete nerve injury in one patient. DASH scores improved on average 29.3 points postoperatively (SD = 27.0, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Medial wall perforation is common in smaller patients during arthroscopic superior labral repairs; the suprascapular nerve can be injured if perforation occurs. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear. In spite of a high drill-out rate, the nerve is rarely injured; however, an anchor designed for implantation into bone that is instead lodged in the soft tissues has the potential to harm these tissues and surrounding structures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, treatment study, Level III.

A retrospective cohort study of displaced segmental radial head fractures: is 2 mm of articular displacement an indication for surgery?

HYPOTHESIS: Many investigators agree that 2 mm of articular displacement is a reasonable indication for open reduction and internal fixation of Mason type II fractures of the radial head. However, there is no evidence to support that this degree of articular displacement is predictive of poor outcomes in conservatively treated fractures. We hypothesized there would be no difference between conservatively treated radial head fractures with greater 2 mm of displacement and those with less than 2 mm of displacement in terms of patient-reported or clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed databases of all radial head fractures in our region. The primary outcomes were the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included radiologic radiocapitellar arthritis and range of motion (ROM) at follow-up. Postinjury treatment protocols, as well as patient factors, were examined for their effects on outcome. RESULTS: The results showed no significant difference in any outcome for conservatively treated radial head fractures with 2 mm (P = .8) or even 3 mm (P = .6) of articular displacement over a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Early ROM and physiotherapy showed no significant differences in any outcome measure. Dominant hand injury showed no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes; however, ROM was significantly decreased on examination. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review suggests that fracture displacement of 2 to 3 mm is not necessarily an indication for surgical fixation in isolated fractures of the radial head. In addition, it appears that postinjury ROM/physiotherapy does not play a large role in improving patient outcome.

An evaluation of the responsiveness and discriminant validity of shoulder questionnaires among patients receiving surgical correction of shoulder instability.

Health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) measures must detect clinically important changes over time and between different patient subgroups. Forty-three patients (32 M, 13 F; mean age = 26.00 ± 8.19 years) undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair completed three validated shoulder questionnaires (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment form (ASES), Constant score) preoperatively, and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Responsiveness and discriminant validity was assessed between those with a satisfactory outcome and those with (1) a major recurrence of instability, (2) a single episode of subluxation, (3) any postoperative episode of instability. Eight (20%) patients reported recurrent instability. Compared to baseline, the WOSI detected improvement at the 6- (P < 0.001) and 12-month (P = 0.011) evaluations. The ASES showed improvement at 6 months (P = 0.003), while the Constant score did not report significant improvement until 12 months postoperatively (P = 0.001). Only the WOSI detected differential shoulder function related to shoulder instability. Those experiencing even a single episode of subluxation reported a 10% drop in their WOSI score, attaining the previously established minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Those experiencing a frank dislocation or multiple episodes of subluxation reported a 20% decline. The WOSI allows better discrimination of the severity of postoperative instability symptoms following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Systematic review: nonoperative and operative treatments for rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Many approaches exist for managing rotator cuff tears. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits and harms of nonoperative and operative interventions on clinically important outcomes in adults with rotator cuff tears. DATA SOURCES: 12 electronic databases (1990 to September 2009), gray literature, trial registries, and reference lists were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled and uncontrolled studies that assessed nonoperative or operative treatments or postoperative rehabilitation for adults with confirmed rotator cuff tears were included. Operative studies in English-language publications and nonoperative and postoperative rehabilitation studies in English, French, or German were considered. Studies were assessed in duplicate. DATA EXTRACTION: 2 reviewers assessed risk for bias by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. One reviewer rated the evidence by using a modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by another. DATA SYNTHESIS: 137 studies met eligibility criteria. All trials had high risk for bias. Cohort and uncontrolled studies were of moderate quality. Reported functional outcomes did not differ between open versus mini-open repair, mini-open versus arthroscopic repair, arthroscopic repair with versus without acromioplasty, or single-row versus double-row fixation. Earlier return to work was reported for mini-open repair versus open repair and for continuous passive motion with physical therapy versus physical therapy alone. Open repairs showed greater improvement in function than did arthroscopic debridement. Complication rates were low across all interventions. LIMITATIONS: Limited evidence, which was often of low quality, precluded conclusions for most comparisons. Language restrictions may have excluded some relevant studies, and selective outcome reporting may have introduced bias. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the comparative effectiveness and harms of various operative and nonoperative treatments for rotator cuff tears is limited and inconclusive. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

The interobserver reliability of classification systems for radial head fractures: the Hotchkiss modification of the Mason classification and the AO classification systems.

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures are common injuries, and there is little information on the reliability of classification systems for such injuries. The purpose of our study was to report the interobserver reliability of 2 commonly used classification systems: the Hotchkiss modification of the Mason classification and the AO classification systems. METHODS: We compiled the radiographs from a cohort series of 43 patients with radial head fractures, and 5 observers classified the radiographs according to both classification systems. Additionally, we collapsed the systems, with types II and III combined for the Hotchkiss classification and the final digit dropped for the AO classification. We calculated percent agreement, the kappa statistic and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The mean percent agreement was 72.3% (95% CI 65.8%-78.9%) for the Hotchkiss classification and 37.7% (95% CI 30.5%-44.9%) for the AO classification. The kappa statistic was 0.585 (0.541-0.661) for the Hotchkiss classification and 0.261 (0.240-0.350) for the AO classification. The mean percent agreement was 89.3% (86.6%-92.0%) for the consolidated Hotchkiss classification and 67.4% (54.6%-80.3%) for the consolidated AO classification. The kappa statistic was 0.760 (0.691-0.805) for the consolidated Hotchkiss classification and 0.455 (0.372-0.521) for the consolidated AO classification. CONCLUSION: The interobserver reliability for the Hotchkiss modification of the Mason classification was moderate, and that for the AO classification was fair according to the criteria of Landis and Koch. Collapsing the Hotchkiss classification improved the reliability to substantial, and collapsing the AO system improved reliability to the lower end of moderate.